tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2911986427253894754.post6092923007019149106..comments2022-03-26T11:39:43.006-04:00Comments on Parasociology: The 1952 UFO wave and Washington D.C.: A case study in parasociology (Part 1)Eric Ouellethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02630372990055395413noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2911986427253894754.post-18125527848540355842011-09-22T21:22:50.306-04:002011-09-22T21:22:50.306-04:00Parapsychology has lots of skeptics. No matter how...Parapsychology has lots of skeptics. No matter how you try to reason out, their opinions will always be as tough as steel.<br /><br /><a href="http://authenticpsychicreadings.net/" rel="nofollow">psychic phone readings</a>epsychichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10470128566799576629noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2911986427253894754.post-80592239136132082412010-02-14T15:31:32.726-05:002010-02-14T15:31:32.726-05:00M4ever,
The existence of lights that were filmed ...M4ever,<br /><br />The existence of lights that were filmed does not invalidate the thesis I defend here. As discussed in part 3, earthlights are physical objects that can be seen, and can be detected by radar (although not always). What is problematic is not the objects in the sky, which can be explained by earthlights, but their apparant "behavior". The explanation of their behavior informed by research on RSPK is based on existing knowledge about a recognized (even if poorly understood) phenomenon. Scientifically speaking, to imply that it would a spaceship from another world is much more speculative than invoking RSPKs. But strangely enough, people tend to think the oppositite.<br /><br />Best,<br /><br />EricEric Ouellethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01985467572506352039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2911986427253894754.post-71846566827052139192010-02-14T15:25:40.299-05:002010-02-14T15:25:40.299-05:00Ken,
I am not sure if you found the part 2 and 3 ...Ken,<br /><br />I am not sure if you found the part 2 and 3 as interesting, but thanks for your comments.<br /><br />Best Regards,<br /><br />EricEric Ouellethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01985467572506352039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2911986427253894754.post-86181003244051945672010-01-01T10:03:03.355-05:002010-01-01T10:03:03.355-05:00Thanks for this article and effort. It's an in...Thanks for this article and effort. It's an interesting analysis but I also think that events can be made to fit such `outlines'.<br /><br />BTW, `video' exists of lights very similar to the ones you label a hoax in your article.Rick Phillipshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05147795123873989623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2911986427253894754.post-14935145613379500852009-12-27T16:19:02.316-05:002009-12-27T16:19:02.316-05:00Great investigation and reporting are evident in t...Great investigation and reporting are evident in this article. This case is far more important than roswell and it should be made public to everyone. As Ufologist we assume everyone knows about this event. Not the case in a long run. You would be astonished as to how ignorant the public is about past and present ufo cases. The only people that follow these events are the people that truly believe in UFO's. Everyone else could care less, mostly because they are afraid to know the truth. We have to educate the public and the younger generations about these major events in human history. Ken Pfeifer Mufon NJ http://www.worldufophotos.orgKen Pfeifer www.worldufophotos.orghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02442903736407205231noreply@blogger.com